Why the decision is worth reading
Preparation should distinguish hours worked, employer instructions or knowledge, pay arrangements, source records and the separate legal basis of each remedy.
Factual context
An overtime-payment claim can be closely connected to dismissal, reinstatement and compensation for forced absence without becoming the same legal question. In the underlying litigation, bank employees contested dismissals and sought employment-related remedies, including payment for additional working time. Some claims were upheld on appeal and were subsequently considered in cassation. The dispute therefore involved different forms of relief and different evidentiary questions. To understand it, the reader must examine the employee’s recorded work, the employer’s knowledge or instructions and the specific periods to which each monetary claim relates.
Legal question
Evidence of overtime may include timesheets, electronic-entry records, emails, project instructions and the real organisation of work. An employee’s own calculation is relevant, but it does not automatically establish the legal basis for every claimed hour. The employer’s knowledge, direction of work and the applicable contractual arrangements may also be material. Separately, a dismissal claim requires assessment of the asserted ground and any statutory procedure. The analysis should not combine the rules for overtime with those for reinstatement or lost wages: the claims may overlap factually while retaining distinct legal elements.
Practical relevance
For both employers and employees, the practical recommendation is to organise work-time records before the conflict escalates. Keep the employment agreement, schedules, payroll information, communications and calculations for each claimed period. Prepare a separate evidentiary explanation for overtime, dismissal and compensation rather than relying on a single broad allegation. The historical decision does not establish an identical amount payable in all overtime disputes. Results depend on the specific proof and the version of Georgian labour legislation applicable to the facts.
Read the full decision
The editorial summary identifies factual questions and practical implications. For the final disposition and exact reasoning, consult the source publication.
Source decision (PDF)