Skip to content
SUPREME COURT INTERPRETATION · № ას-789-746-2015

Workplace injury and dependent support

How long can compensation for lost support continue after a workplace injury?

OVERVIEW

Why this decision matters

Long-term damage claims need a documented period of support, prior payments, applicable law and causation. Do not transfer past retirement-age rules to current cases without legal review.

01

Facts and procedural context

A historical workplace injury and subsequent death gave rise to a request to recalculate support payments for later years. The court examined the likely duration of the deceased worker’s obligation to support dependants absent the harm.

02

Core judicial reasoning

The decision considered the then-applicable labour rules, working-life assumptions and the personal nature and duration of the support obligation. Historical dates and legal regimes are integral to its reasoning.

03

Practical implications

Long-term damage claims need a documented period of support, prior payments, applicable law and causation. Do not transfer past retirement-age rules to current cases without legal review.

SOURCE AND VERIFICATION

Read the complete court interpretation

This independent editorial analysis does not replace the decision. Confirm the legislation applicable at the time and the current version.

Full interpretation (PDF)
THE NEXT STEP

Need an assessment of your case?

Share the key facts and intended outcome. We can identify the initial scope and next steps.

Start a conversation